Openwrt/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0080-wireguard-socket-mark-skbs-as-not-on-list-when-recei.patch
Jason A. Donenfeld 196f3d586f kernel-5.4: bump to 5.4.102 and refresh patches
5.4.102 backported a lot of stuff that our WireGuard backport already
did, in addition to other patches we had, so those patches were
removed from that part of the series. In the process other patches were
refreshed or reworked to account for upstream changes.

This commit involved `update_kernel.sh -v -u 5.4`.

Cc: John Audia <graysky@archlinux.us>
Cc: David Bauer <mail@david-bauer.net>
Cc: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
2021-03-04 22:06:53 +01:00

35 lines
1.3 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:47:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] wireguard: socket: mark skbs as not on list when receiving
via gro
commit 736775d06bac60d7a353e405398b48b2bd8b1e54 upstream.
Certain drivers will pass gro skbs to udp, at which point the udp driver
simply iterates through them and passes them off to encap_rcv, which is
where we pick up. At the moment, we're not attempting to coalesce these
into bundles, but we also don't want to wind up having cascaded lists of
skbs treated separately. The right behavior here, then, is to just mark
each incoming one as not on a list. This can be seen in practice, for
example, with Qualcomm's rmnet_perf driver.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Tested-by: Yaroslav Furman <yaro330@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c
@@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ static int wg_receive(struct sock *sk, s
wg = sk->sk_user_data;
if (unlikely(!wg))
goto err;
+ skb_mark_not_on_list(skb);
wg_packet_receive(wg, skb);
return 0;