Openwrt/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0075-wireguard-global-fix-spelling-mistakes-in-comments.patch
Jason A. Donenfeld 196f3d586f kernel-5.4: bump to 5.4.102 and refresh patches
5.4.102 backported a lot of stuff that our WireGuard backport already
did, in addition to other patches we had, so those patches were
removed from that part of the series. In the process other patches were
refreshed or reworked to account for upstream changes.

This commit involved `update_kernel.sh -v -u 5.4`.

Cc: John Audia <graysky@archlinux.us>
Cc: David Bauer <mail@david-bauer.net>
Cc: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
2021-03-04 22:06:53 +01:00

67 lines
2.9 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josh Soref <jsoref@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:08:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] wireguard: global: fix spelling mistakes in comments
commit a2ec8b5706944d228181c8b91d815f41d6dd8e7b upstream.
This fixes two spelling errors in source code comments.
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@gmail.com>
[Jason: rewrote commit message]
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c | 2 +-
include/uapi/linux/wireguard.h | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static void wg_packet_consume_data_done(
/* We've already verified the Poly1305 auth tag, which means this packet
* was not modified in transit. We can therefore tell the networking
* stack that all checksums of every layer of encapsulation have already
- * been checked "by the hardware" and therefore is unneccessary to check
+ * been checked "by the hardware" and therefore is unnecessary to check
* again in software.
*/
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
--- a/include/uapi/linux/wireguard.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/wireguard.h
@@ -18,13 +18,13 @@
* one but not both of:
*
* WGDEVICE_A_IFINDEX: NLA_U32
- * WGDEVICE_A_IFNAME: NLA_NUL_STRING, maxlen IFNAMESIZ - 1
+ * WGDEVICE_A_IFNAME: NLA_NUL_STRING, maxlen IFNAMSIZ - 1
*
* The kernel will then return several messages (NLM_F_MULTI) containing the
* following tree of nested items:
*
* WGDEVICE_A_IFINDEX: NLA_U32
- * WGDEVICE_A_IFNAME: NLA_NUL_STRING, maxlen IFNAMESIZ - 1
+ * WGDEVICE_A_IFNAME: NLA_NUL_STRING, maxlen IFNAMSIZ - 1
* WGDEVICE_A_PRIVATE_KEY: NLA_EXACT_LEN, len WG_KEY_LEN
* WGDEVICE_A_PUBLIC_KEY: NLA_EXACT_LEN, len WG_KEY_LEN
* WGDEVICE_A_LISTEN_PORT: NLA_U16
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
* WGDEVICE_A_IFINDEX and WGDEVICE_A_IFNAME:
*
* WGDEVICE_A_IFINDEX: NLA_U32
- * WGDEVICE_A_IFNAME: NLA_NUL_STRING, maxlen IFNAMESIZ - 1
+ * WGDEVICE_A_IFNAME: NLA_NUL_STRING, maxlen IFNAMSIZ - 1
* WGDEVICE_A_FLAGS: NLA_U32, 0 or WGDEVICE_F_REPLACE_PEERS if all current
* peers should be removed prior to adding the list below.
* WGDEVICE_A_PRIVATE_KEY: len WG_KEY_LEN, all zeros to remove
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
* filling in information not contained in the prior. Note that if
* WGDEVICE_F_REPLACE_PEERS is specified in the first message, it probably
* should not be specified in fragments that come after, so that the list
- * of peers is only cleared the first time but appened after. Likewise for
+ * of peers is only cleared the first time but appended after. Likewise for
* peers, if WGPEER_F_REPLACE_ALLOWEDIPS is specified in the first message
* of a peer, it likely should not be specified in subsequent fragments.
*