oxnas: dts: Unify naming of gpio-led nodes
In DTS Checklist[1] we're now demanding proper generic node names, as the name of a node should reflect the function of the device and use generic name for that[2]. Everybody seems to be copy&pasting from DTS files available in the repository today, so let's unify that naming there as well and provide proper examples. 1. https://openwrt.org/submitting-patches#dts_checklist 2. https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/master/source/devicetree-basics.rst#generic-names-recommendation Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz> Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com> [split up]
This commit is contained in:
parent
4a954e8620
commit
9292822023
@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
gpio-leds {
|
||||
leds {
|
||||
compatible = "gpio-leds";
|
||||
pinctrl-names = "default";
|
||||
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_leds>;
|
||||
|
@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
gpio-leds {
|
||||
leds {
|
||||
compatible = "gpio-leds";
|
||||
status {
|
||||
label = "zyxel:blue:status";
|
||||
|
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
gpio-leds {
|
||||
leds {
|
||||
compatible = "gpio-leds";
|
||||
status {
|
||||
label = "kd20:blue:status";
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user